Caso Avícola Villalobos
  • Guatemala
  • Panama
  • Records

Case File

Exp. 83573-21

Summary Accounting Lawsuit

Country
Panama
Group
Villamorey Dividend Recovery
Plaintiffs
  • Lisa, S.A.
  • BDT Investments Inc.
Defendant
  • Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez

Documents

  1. Appeal RulingSep 30 2022
  2. Order 12Jan 5 2023
  3. Order E-127Jan 25 2023
  4. Order 712Apr 11 2023
  5. Letters Rogatory 29Jul 19 2023
  6. NotificationOct 4 2023
  7. MotionJan 10 2024
  8. Edict 246Jun 21 2024
  9. OrderAug 9 2024
  10. Order 18Jan 10 2025
  11. AppealFeb 19 2025
  12. AppealMar 13 2025
  13. EdictApr 7 2025
  14. Appeal RulingJul 9 2025
  15. MotionJul 21 2025
  16. Appeal RulingAug 21 2025
  17. Order AutoSep 12 2025
  18. Cassation AppealOct 20 2025
  19. Edict 1537Nov 24 2025
Exp. 83573-21
Download

Edict 246

Summons Bosch by edict after letters rogatory to Guatemala fail to achieve personal service

Issued on

Jun 21 2024

Issued by

16th Civil Court

DownloadPDF

Summoning Edict No. 246, issued on June 21, 2024 by the Sixteenth Circuit Civil Court of the First Judicial Circuit of Panama, formally summoned Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez to appear in the summary accounting proceeding brought against him by Lisa, S.A. The edict was published for five consecutive days in La Estrella de Panamá, from July 8 through 12, 2024.

Procedural Context

The resort to service by edict followed the exhaustion of ordinary notification mechanisms. In July 2023, the court had issued letters rogatory to Guatemala for personal service on Bosch, a Guatemalan national. In October 2023, diplomatic dispatch of those letters was authorized. In January 2024, Lisa filed a motion requesting information on the Guatemalan authority that had received the letters rogatory, reflecting the lack of response to international service attempts. Having exhausted personal notification, the court turned to service by edict as a subsidiary mechanism.

Content of the Edict

The edict granted Bosch twenty days from the date of the last publication to appear before the court through legal counsel and assert his rights. It expressly warned that failure to appear would result in the appointment of an absent-defendant attorney who would represent him through the remainder of the proceedings, pursuant to Article 1012 of the Judicial Code.

"Se le advierte al emplazado que si no comparece en el término indicado, se le nombrará un DEFENSOR DE AUSENTE con quien se seguirá el proceso en los estrados del Tribunal hasta su terminación" (Page 1)

Legal Basis

  • Article 1012 of the Judicial Code — Governs the procedure for appointing an absent-defendant attorney when the defendant fails to appear after service by edict.

Procedural Outcome

Bosch did not appear within the prescribed period. On August 9, 2024, the court issued an order appointing Licenciado Miguel Ruiz as absent-defendant attorney, with litigation expenses set at $1,500.00. Bosch's failure to appear, despite publication in a nationally circulated newspaper, allowed the proceeding to advance without his direct participation.

Signatories

  • Lcda. Carolina Portillo de Gittens, Special Acting Judge
  • Lcdo. Kirk Calvera, Court Clerk
Next in case
Appoints absent-defendant attorney and sets $1,500 in expenses after Bosch fails to answer edict
Aug 9 2024