Edict 1537

Procedural Context

This edict is the Supreme Court's first action following Lisa's <doc id="pty-83573-21-2025-10-20-a" /> on the merits, filed on October 20, 2025. In that brief, Lisa challenged the <doc id="pty-83573-21-2025-07-09-a" /> issued by the First Superior Tribunal on July 9, 2025, which upheld the dismissal of the accounting action on the grounds that Lisa lacked active standing due to its prior assignment of rights to BDT Investments Inc., and that Bosch lacked passive standing because he acted as Villamorey, S.A.'s representative rather than in his personal capacity. Lisa's cassation rests on two grounds: error of law in the assessment of evidence and direct violation by omission of substantive legal provisions, including the Tribunal's failure to rule on BDT's request to intervene as litisconsorte under Articles 612 and 835 of the Judicial Code.

Ruling

• The Supreme Court placed the matter on the docket for a six-day admissibility briefing period.
• Within the first three days, the opposing party (Bosch) must submit arguments on the admissibility of the cassation appeal.
• Within the following three days, Lisa may file a reply to those arguments.

Signatories

• Angela Russo de Cedeño, Magistrate
• Sonia F. de Castroverde, Judicial Secretary