Lisa, S.A. objects to four defense evidence submissions as biased, irrelevant, and procedurally defective
Dec 12 2024
Lisa, S.A.
On December 12, 2024, Lisa, S.A., through its counsel Lcda. María Luisa Villarreal Palacios, files formal objections to four evidence submissions by the defendants in the ordinary damages proceeding. The brief challenges both documentary evidence introduced in the answer to the complaint and a report evidence request made during the evidentiary period, complementing the counter-evidence brief filed six days earlier.
Documentary evidence #2. Lisa objects as irrelevant and improper to the authenticated copy of a letter-rogatory notification request from the proceedings before the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court. Lisa maintains that, as demonstrated by the counter-evidence already submitted, this request was filed in compliance with a court order, not as a voluntary act by Lisa. The defendants presented the document in a biased and incomplete manner, omitting the evidence establishing the judicial context of the request.
Documentary evidence #3. Lisa objects as improper to the copy of the settlement agreement between BDT Investment, Inc. and Lisa, S.A., on the grounds that it fails to meet the requirements of Article 857 of the Judicial Code.
Documentary evidence #6. Lisa objects as irrelevant and improper to the authenticated copy of Order No. 1827-2020 from the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court, as it is a resolution issued in a context unrelated to the present proceeding and bears no connection to the matters at issue in this case.
Lisa objects as irrelevant and ineffective to the report evidence request through which the defendants seek an order directing the Twelfth Circuit Civil Court to produce an authenticated copy of the settlement agreement between BDT Investment, Inc. and Lisa, S.A. Lisa argues that the agreement, standing alone, is not relevant to the present proceeding, and that the defendants persist in submitting biased, incomplete, and irrelevant evidence.