Caso Avícola Villalobos
  • Guatemala
  • Panama
  • Records

Case File

Exp. 556-99

Ordinary Lawsuit of High Value

Country
Panama
Group
Villamorey Dividend Recovery
Plaintiff
  • Villamorey, S.A.
Defendant
  • Lisa, S.A.

Documents

  1. Judgement 42-08Jul 11 2008
  2. Order 1624-08Oct 27 2008
  3. Official NoticeNov 25 2008
  4. Appeal RulingAug 28 2012
  5. Order 2277-2018Dec 5 2018
  6. Appeal RulingJul 12 2019
  7. Amparo 1022-19Jun 24 2020
  8. Order 1827-2020Dec 10 2020
  9. MotionFeb 10 2025
  10. MotionFeb 11 2025
  11. MotionMar 27 2025
  12. MotionApr 30 2025
Exp. 556-99
Download

Motion

Lisa, S.A. rebuts finality challenge raised in criminal proceedings, reiterates dividend return demand

Issued on

Mar 27 2025

Issued by

Lisa, S.A.

DownloadPDF

Lisa, S.A., through counsel Lcda. María Luisa Villarreal Palacios, reiterated before the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court its petitions for return of retained dividends and a civil contempt declaration against Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez. The filing recapitulates the grounds of the motions filed on February 10, 2025 and February 11, 2025, and introduces a new procedural fact arising from the parallel criminal proceeding against Bosch Gutiérrez.

Non-Finality Claim in Criminal Proceedings

The filing's new element is factual. At a recent hearing before a Guarantees Court, held in connection with the criminal complaint Lisa, S.A. filed against Bosch Gutiérrez for his conduct as judicial depositary, defense counsel asserted before the magistrates that the order directing return of funds to Lisa, S.A. was not yet final. Lisa, S.A. characterizes this as an attempt to mislead the criminal court about the procedural status of the civil case.

Finality Chain of Order No. 2277-2018

The filing rebuts the criminal defense's claim by reconstructing the complete finality chain of Order No. 2277-2018. Villamorey, S.A. appealed the order, but the First Superior Court declined jurisdiction in July 2019, holding that the resolution was not among the numerus clausus of appealable orders. Villamorey, S.A. then filed a constitutional amparo action, which the Plenary of the Supreme Court of Justice denied unanimously in June 2020. With all avenues of challenge exhausted, Order No. 2277-2018 became definitively final. The criminal defense's contention that the order is not yet executory has no basis in the civil record.

Procedural Context

The filing recapitulates the three predicates supporting the return obligation: the extinction of the $894,718.00 judgment through set-off ordered by Order No. 2277-2018, the lifting of the BDT Investments, Inc. attachment communicated via Official Notice No. 29 of January 3, 2025, and the absence of any precautionary measure in force against Lisa, S.A. It reiterates Bosch Gutiérrez's obligation, as judicial depositary constituted under Article 536(4) of the Judicial Code, to render a full accounting of sixteen years of custody and return the retained sums.

"Le reiteramos nuestra solicitud de girar las comunicaciones de rigor tanto a la sociedad VILLAMOREY, S.A., como al señor JUAN LUIS BOSCH GUTIERREZ, quienes están obligados a acatar la instrucción de devolver a LISA, S.A, las sumas de dinero cuya devolución por este despacho fue ordenada desde que el Auto No. 2277 de 05 de diciembre de 2018 quedó ejecutoriado" (Page 3)

Relief Sought

  • That the court issue formal communications to Villamorey, S.A. and Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez confirming the executory status of Order No. 2277-2018 and the obligation to return the retained funds
  • That the court compel the judicial depositary's appearance through available legal mechanisms
  • That, should the depositary refuse to appear, the court declare him in contempt

Legal Basis

  • Article 536(4) of the Judicial Code — establishes the constitution of a judicial deposit when a third party holds assets belonging to the defendant, and the legal responsibilities of the depositary so constituted

Signatories

  • Lcda. María Luisa Villarreal Palacios, Counsel for Lisa, S.A.
Next in case
Lisa reiterates dividend return petition with share register proof of baseless sequestration annotation
Apr 30 2025