Appeal Ruling
Panama's First Superior Tribunal rejected Bosch's petition to modify the cost award, upholding Lisa, S.A.'s exoneration based on a finding of good-faith litigation conduct.
- Issued on
- Aug 21 2025
- Issued by
- 1st Superior Tribunal
- Pages
- 9
The First Superior Tribunal of the First Judicial District of Panama denied Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez's petition to modify the cost award in the summary accounting proceeding, . The court upheld the exoneration of Lisa, S.A. from costs, finding that Lisa pursued its claims without bad faith, abuse of process, or recklessness, even though its arguments ultimately failed. The ruling maintains the of July 9, 2025, which had modified the first-instance judgment solely to exonerate Lisa from costs.
Analysis
Defendant's Petition
Galindo, Arias y López, counsel for Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez, grounded the petition in Article 999 of the Judicial Code, which permits a court to modify its cost determination within three days of notification. The petition argued that Lisa, S.A. lacked standing to sue (legitimación activa) and that Bosch was not the depositary of the shares or dividends claimed, negating his standing to be sued (legitimación pasiva). Counsel invoked Article 1071 of the Judicial Code, which mandates cost awards against the losing party as the default rule and enumerates circumstances under which good faith cannot be presumed, including when no evidence is offered to support the claims in the complaint.
Tribunal's Analysis
The tribunal acknowledged the procedural viability of the petition, confirming it was filed within the three-day window under Article 999 of the Judicial Code, but rejected its substantive arguments. The panel held that, although Lisa, S.A.'s arguments did not succeed, it cannot be said that Lisa acted recklessly, abusively, or in bad faith. The tribunal emphasized that Lisa attempted to assert its rights in a complex legal context with documentary evidence that, while insufficient, was not entirely without foundation.
"Esta colegiatura se mantiene en el criterio en que la parte actora sostuvo su pretensión y aunque su argumentación no próspero, no puede afirmarse que haya actuado de forma temeraria, abusiva o de mala fe en este proceso." (Page 4)
Ruling
- By ruling of August 21, 2025, the court maintained Judgment No. 71 of July 9, 2025, issued by the First Superior Tribunal within , brought by Lisa, S.A. against Juan Luis Bosch Gutierrez
- The exoneration of Lisa, S.A. from costs established in the of July 9, 2025 remains in effect
Legal Basis
- Article 999 of the Judicial Code — establishes the principle of immutability of judicial decisions, with an exception permitting costs to be completed, modified, or clarified within three days of notification
- Article 1071 of the Judicial Code — governs cost awards and good-faith determinations; the tribunal applied it to conclude that Lisa, S.A.'s exoneration was warranted
Signatories
- Miguel A. Espino G., Magistrate
- Yira Bernal González, Magistrate
- Carlos I. Pizarro H., Magistrate
Documents
19| Document | Date |
|---|---|
| Sep 30 2022 | |
| Jan 5 2023 | |
| Jan 25 2023 | |
| Apr 11 2023 | |
| Jul 19 2023 | |
| Oct 4 2023 | |
| Jan 10 2024 | |
| Jun 21 2024 | |
| Aug 9 2024 | |
| Jan 10 2025 | |
| Feb 19 2025 | |
| Mar 13 2025 | |
| Apr 7 2025 | |
| Jul 9 2025 | |
| Jul 21 2025 | |
| Aug 21 2025 | |
| Sep 12 2025 | |
| Oct 20 2025 | |
| Nov 24 2025 |
