Interview Record
Javier Castillero Anzola, Chief Clerk of the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court, testified before anti-corruption prosecutors that the case ended with Order No. 2277-18, bonds were released, and the file was archived in 2021.
- Issued on
- Feb 6 2025
- Issued by
- Public Prosecutor
- Pages
- 3
Javier Castillero Anzola, Chief Clerk of the Eleventh Circuit Civil Court, testified before anti-corruption prosecutors that the civil case concluded with of December 5, 2018, which directed the parties to set off mutual obligations and ordered the file archived. Castillero confirmed that bonds were released through Order No. 1867-19 and the case file was sent to the judicial archives on January 5, 2021, rendering the matter fully terminated. The interview took place days after Lisa, S.A. filed a requesting an Interpol location alert for Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez, who had not been located for notification of the admitted criminal complaint.
Analysis
Content of Testimony
Conclusion of the civil case. Castillero stated that the judgment execution phase ended with of December 5, 2018, which directed the parties to set off any sums owed to each other, including dividends generated by the 33.3% of sequestered shares. The presiding judge at the time was Licenciada María Cedeño, who is no longer with the institution.
Release of bonds and archival. Following the close of execution, outstanding bonds were released to their beneficiaries through Order No. 1867-19 of August 8, 2019, canceling the surety contracts. Castillero recounted that BDT Investments, Inc. subsequently attempted to initiate enforcement proceedings at the Twelfth Circuit Civil Court but was informed there was nothing to report, as the execution had already concluded. The case file was transferred to the Judiciary's archives on January 5, 2021 (exit No. 201), where it was stored in bundle 852.
"A partir de allí, se llevaron a cabo actuaciones relacionadas con la liberación de las cauciones que se encontraban vigentes." (Page 2)
Practical effect: Castillero's testimony establishes that, from the civil court's perspective, the case is a terminated and archived proceeding with nothing outstanding to return or determine. This testimony is relevant to the criminal investigation because it confirms that the set-off obligation arising from was never fulfilled despite the file being archived, supporting the theory of misappropriation by Juan Luis Bosch Gutiérrez.
Signatories
- Javier Castillero, Interviewee
- Melanie López, Operations Assistant
Documents
24| Document | Date |
|---|---|
| May 9 2023 | |
| May 10 2023 | |
| May 26 2023 | |
| Jun 22 2023 | |
| Jun 22 2023 | |
| Aug 24 2023 | |
| Sep 21 2023 | |
| Oct 11 2023 | |
| Nov 14 2023 | |
| Dec 26 2023 | |
| Feb 8 2024 | |
| Mar 13 2024 | |
| Jun 3 2024 | |
| Aug 23 2024 | |
| Sep 23 2024 | |
| Oct 8 2024 | |
| Oct 22 2024 | |
| Jan 22 2025 | |
| Jan 31 2025 | |
| Feb 6 2025 | |
| Mar 21 2025 | |
| Mar 21 2025 | |
| May 27 2025 | |
| Aug 19 2025 |
